<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mini Sites and Landing Pages for Affiliate PPC are Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html</link>
	<description>Leading Affiliate Marketing Blog - Industry News, Tips and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Buquet</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html/comment-page-1#comment-27392</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Buquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html#comment-27392</guid>
		<description>So true Nate!

One of the ideas I&#039;ve been toying with for a long time, is building a comprehensive full site around a certain topic that is broad enough to cover lots of different offers, yet focused enough to satisfy quality issues with Google and targeted enough to give the consumer a good relevent url to help with CTR.

Example - sample url:
bestrates.com. Build out a site with subdomains like mortgage.bestrates.com.  That section would be full of articles about how to find the best rates on mortgage loans. Then landing page is at: mortgage.bestrates.com/freequote.html Same thing with sections on  free insurance quotes and can loans, etc.

Obviously that&#039;s not the market I would target, just running by the basic concept. To me it seems if free financial quotes for example was a market you wanted to focus on then this would do a couple things. 

It would be worth putting the energy into to build out all the content because it would also be designed to pull natural search traffic. Varied enough to accommodate a variety of offers, segmented enough to be somewhat targeted for quality score and consumer click-through.

Anyway, that&#039;s similar to what I think I&#039;ll do when I finally find time to go out and do affiliate marketing myself. Have some great domains that will work. Different market, more complex plan but that&#039;s the gist of it. 

Yes? No? Maybe???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true Nate!</p>
<p>One of the ideas I&#8217;ve been toying with for a long time, is building a comprehensive full site around a certain topic that is broad enough to cover lots of different offers, yet focused enough to satisfy quality issues with Google and targeted enough to give the consumer a good relevent url to help with CTR.</p>
<p>Example &#8211; sample url:<br />
bestrates.com. Build out a site with subdomains like mortgage.bestrates.com.  That section would be full of articles about how to find the best rates on mortgage loans. Then landing page is at: mortgage.bestrates.com/freequote.html Same thing with sections on  free insurance quotes and can loans, etc.</p>
<p>Obviously that&#8217;s not the market I would target, just running by the basic concept. To me it seems if free financial quotes for example was a market you wanted to focus on then this would do a couple things. </p>
<p>It would be worth putting the energy into to build out all the content because it would also be designed to pull natural search traffic. Varied enough to accommodate a variety of offers, segmented enough to be somewhat targeted for quality score and consumer click-through.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s similar to what I think I&#8217;ll do when I finally find time to go out and do affiliate marketing myself. Have some great domains that will work. Different market, more complex plan but that&#8217;s the gist of it. </p>
<p>Yes? No? Maybe???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Nead</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html/comment-page-1#comment-27391</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Nead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html#comment-27391</guid>
		<description>But even if we just consider that the &quot;long run&quot; will be effected, it&#039;s still not good for those of us doing it...I want a long run, sustainable market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But even if we just consider that the &#8220;long run&#8221; will be effected, it&#8217;s still not good for those of us doing it&#8230;I want a long run, sustainable market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Buquet</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html/comment-page-1#comment-27389</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Buquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html#comment-27389</guid>
		<description>EXCELLENT points Vlad. 

If I said mini sites &amp; landing pages kinda sorta don&#039;t work as well any more, maybe no one would have much of an opinion. Hoped if I said they are DEAD, I&#039;d get some people to comment and counter. (Plus that wording was in the title of the blog I&#039;m quoting.)

Your comments are exactly the type of info that I hoped this post would stimulate!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELLENT points Vlad. </p>
<p>If I said mini sites &#038; landing pages kinda sorta don&#8217;t work as well any more, maybe no one would have much of an opinion. Hoped if I said they are DEAD, I&#8217;d get some people to comment and counter. (Plus that wording was in the title of the blog I&#8217;m quoting.)</p>
<p>Your comments are exactly the type of info that I hoped this post would stimulate!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html/comment-page-1#comment-27388</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1496/mini-sites-landing-pages-ppc.html#comment-27388</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree with this 100%. I think a better title for this would be &quot;Mini Sites and Landing Pages for Affiliate PPC are Dead on the long run&quot;
For offer testing they are perfect and will always be. You don&#039;t need more than 1-2000 clicks to realize if an offer is good or not and usually the campaign won&#039;t get slapped so fast. 
After finding a good offer start a larger site and update it constantly. 

I use a different adw account for testing so that my main account isn&#039;t affected by the constant slaps:).
If you didn&#039;t get enough clicks and got slapped try removing the slapped keywords and adding them again after some time(couple of hours)-usually works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with this 100%. I think a better title for this would be &#8220;Mini Sites and Landing Pages for Affiliate PPC are Dead on the long run&#8221;<br />
For offer testing they are perfect and will always be. You don&#8217;t need more than 1-2000 clicks to realize if an offer is good or not and usually the campaign won&#8217;t get slapped so fast.<br />
After finding a good offer start a larger site and update it constantly. </p>
<p>I use a different adw account for testing so that my main account isn&#8217;t affected by the constant slaps:).<br />
If you didn&#8217;t get enough clicks and got slapped try removing the slapped keywords and adding them again after some time(couple of hours)-usually works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

