<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googles Spam Guidelines Single Out CJ Affiliate Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html</link>
	<description>Leading Affiliate Marketing Blog - Industry News, Tips and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:13:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda Buquet</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-26946</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Buquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html#comment-26946</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome Hock. Thanks for stopping by to comment 
and for the link back from your blog about the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Hock. Thanks for stopping by to comment<br />
and for the link back from your blog about the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Google Spam Guidelines: Know Thy Enemy&#160;by&#160;Marketing Tools Review</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-26945</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Google Spam Guidelines: Know Thy Enemy&#160;by&#160;Marketing Tools Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html#comment-26945</guid>
		<description>[...] like they&#8217;re trying to shut down even honest affiliate marketers. I just read Linda&#8217;s post on the new Google spam guidelines (for Google Quality Raters) and it looks like they are really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like they&#8217;re trying to shut down even honest affiliate marketers. I just read Linda&#8217;s post on the new Google spam guidelines (for Google Quality Raters) and it looks like they are really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hock</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-26944</link>
		<dc:creator>Hock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html#comment-26944</guid>
		<description>Linda, thanks for brining this issue to the forefront. Affiliates need to be constantly adjusting to the changing landscape. That&#039;s part of the business!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda, thanks for brining this issue to the forefront. Affiliates need to be constantly adjusting to the changing landscape. That&#8217;s part of the business!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Buquet</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-26937</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Buquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html#comment-26937</guid>
		<description>OH and better read it quick or download while you can.  

Lots of other places I found that had it - now go to a 404 so must have had to take it down. This is the only one I found left standing and it may not be up for long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH and better read it quick or download while you can.  </p>
<p>Lots of other places I found that had it &#8211; now go to a 404 so must have had to take it down. This is the only one I found left standing and it may not be up for long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Buquet</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-26936</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Buquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html#comment-26936</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jeremy. Luckily I discovered this over the weekend and wasn&#039;t busy launching a new affiliate program, so had time to research and digest it a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jeremy. Luckily I discovered this over the weekend and wasn&#8217;t busy launching a new affiliate program, so had time to research and digest it a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Palmer</title>
		<link>http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-26935</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliate-blogs.5staraffiliateprograms.com/1411/googles-spam-guidelines-cj-affiliate-links.html#comment-26935</guid>
		<description>Good summary Linda. I&#039;ve read a few other snippets from other blog posts and yours has been one of the most relevant.

I really need to sit down and read that whole doc. I&#039;m happy it was leaked. Too bad Google just can&#039;t be transparent with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary Linda. I&#8217;ve read a few other snippets from other blog posts and yours has been one of the most relevant.</p>
<p>I really need to sit down and read that whole doc. I&#8217;m happy it was leaked. Too bad Google just can&#8217;t be transparent with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
